Nextron GTX 1650 4GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB
The Nextron GTX 1650 4GB uses the NVIDIA GTX 1650 (Turing), 4 GB on a 128-bit bus, 75 W board power, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB uses the NVIDIA RTX A400 (Ampere), 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, 50 W board power.
Final score
13 / 100
Lowest price
₹16,799
at Computech Store
Compare different graphics cards
Overview
Sub-scores from 0 to 100, relative to the best product in our database.
Scoring for: Balanced
Value for money
Balanced score points per ₹1,000, using today's lowest in-stock prices.
0.77
score points per ₹1,000
0.44
score points per ₹1,000
Nextron GTX 1650 4GB is ₹8,201 cheaper right now.
The verdict
It's practically a tie.
- Both score within 2 points overall (13 vs 11).
- Nextron GTX 1650 4GB is the smarter buy at today's prices.
- NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB uses a PCIe x8 link; on PCIe 3.0 motherboards it can lose some performance.
Pick Nextron GTX 1650 4GB if…
- you game at 1080p or play esports titles (1080p Gaming score 17 vs 12)
- your motherboard only has PCIe 3.0
- you want to save money (cheaper by ₹8,201)
Pick NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB if…
- you want a cooler, quieter build
- you want ray-traced lighting in games
Still here? Scroll down, nerd: every number we have is waiting below. ↓
Key differences
Only real differences in specs, scores and price. Ties are left out.
Advantages of Nextron GTX 1650 4GB
- 86% faster at 1080p
- 80% faster at 1440p
- 75% faster at 4K
- 20% better performance per watt
- Full x16 PCIe link (vs x8): no slowdown on older PCIe 3.0 boards
- Cheaper by ₹8,201
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB
- 41% faster GPU rendering
- Newer process node (8 nm vs 12 nm)
- Lower power draw (50 W vs 75 W)
- PCIe 4.0 interface (vs PCIe 3.0)
- Hardware ray tracing support
Benchmarks
Chip-level results: cards using the same GPU perform within a few percent of each other. (est.) marks estimated values.
Gaming performance
Relative average FPS across a game suite (RTX 5090 = 100 at each resolution). Higher is better.
Ray tracing
Relative average FPS with ray tracing on at 1440p (RTX 5090 = 100). Higher is better.
3DMark Time Spy
DirectX 12 synthetic graphics score. Higher is better.
Blender (GPU render)
Blender Open Data median score with CUDA/OptiX, HIP or oneAPI. Higher is better.
Efficiency
Time Spy graphics score divided by rated board power. Higher is better.
Full specifications
The better value is highlighted. “—” means we don't have that spec yet.
| General | Nextron GTX 1650 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | GTX 1650 | RTX A400 |
| Architecture | NVIDIA Turing | NVIDIA Ampere |
| Release Date | Apr 2019 | Apr 2024 ✓ |
| Factory Overclocked | No | No |
| White Edition | No | No |
| GPU Core | Nextron GTX 1650 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Shader Units | 896 | 768 |
| Base Clock | — | — |
| Boost Clock | — | 1,762 MHz |
| L2 / Infinity Cache | 1 MB | — |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm ✓ |
| Memory | Nextron GTX 1650 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | — | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 128-bit ✓ | 64-bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | — | 96 GB/s |
| Power | Nextron GTX 1650 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Board Power | 75 W | 50 W ✓ |
| Recommended PSU | 300 W | — |
| Power Connector | — | none |
| Interface & Features | Nextron GTX 1650 4GB | NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| PCIe Version | 3.0 | 4.0 ✓ |
| PCIe Lanes | x16 ✓ | x8 |
| Hardware Ray Tracing | No | 2nd gen ✓ |
| Upscaling | none | — |
| Frame Generation | No | No |
| AV1 Encoding | No | No |
Related comparisons
- Nextron GTX 1650 4GB vs Nextron Nforce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB
- Nextron GTX 1650 4GB vs Nextron Nforce RX 580 8GB
- Nextron GTX 1650 4GB vs Nextron Nforce RX 550 4GB
- Gigabyte Gaming Arc A380 OC 6GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB
- ASUS Dual RTX 3050 OC 6GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB
- ASRock Challenger RX 9050 8GB vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX A400 4GB